Telangana HC Asks SIT To Issue Fresh Notice To BL Santosh In TRS MLA Poaching Case

Telangana Hc Asks Sit To Issue Fresh Notice To Bl Santosh In Trs Mla Poaching Case,Mla Purchase Case, Give Notice To Bl Santosh By E-Mail, Telangana Hc Orders Sit,Telangana Mla Poaching Case,Telangana Mla Poaching Case Latest News And Updates,Telangana Mla Poaching ,Telangana Bjp,Telangana Cm Kcr,Trs Party,Brs Party,Ysrtp,Brs Party Latest News And Updates,Trs Mlas Purchase Case,Sit Notices Issued To Two Others, Ordered To Appear For Hearing Today,Telangana Sit,Sit Investigation Mla Poaching Case,Trs Mla Poaching Case

Justice B Vijaysen Reddy of the Telangana High Court on Wednesday directed the State Police to issue fresh notices under Section 41-A of Code of Criminal Procedure to BJP national general secretary BL Santosh through email or WhatsApp.

This was after Advocate General BS Prasad informed that the court that Santosh was not cooperating with the investigation. Moreover, the requisition sent by Santosh to the police said he was ”preoccupied” and ”could not confirm the exact date of appearance before the police.

On finding that no counsel was representing Santosh, the judge said the BJP State Secretary G Premender Reddy, who was present in court, had to take responsibility for the party’s national general secretary. The judge also wanted to know whether Santosh wanted to challenge the notice or seek further time or take any other steps.

“There should be no dilemma,” he said, also asking why the BJP, which ”claims so much that it has locus” was not representing Santosh. Responding to the judge, BJP senior counsel Ramchander Rao submitted that Santosh was a senior citizen, aged about 70 years. The moment he received the notice, he had responded, Rao said, to which the AG pointed out that the reply read that ”he has scheduled a tour and is preoccupied”.

”He did not even state how much time he requires,” the AG told the court, while the Additional Advocate General representing the State argued that the BJP’s approach was “unfair and intended to delay the case”. ”The court should not give any further opportunity since the only motive was to delay the investigation and destroy the evidence,” he contended.

When BJP counsel Rao maintained that Santosh was a law-abiding citizen and would not scuttle the process of law, the Judge observed that they should argue as counsels and not as political parties. The Judge felt that they should also ”maintain some standards for the next generations to learn.”

Meanwhile, the Telangana SIT is investigating the matter.

Stay tuned for further updates.

Mango News Link

Telegram: https://t.me/mangonewsofficial

Google Play Store: https://bit.ly/2R4cbgN

Apple / iOS Store: https://apple.co/2xEYFJ

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here